Example Analyses
These analyses were generated using the MCP server’s tools. Every data point was pulled live from federal government APIs — no manual data entry, no copy-paste from websites.
Each example demonstrates cross-referencing multiple data sources to answer complex questions about U.S. policy, economics, and accountability.
Worst-Case Negative Impact — One From Each Party
Prompt: “Find the worst case of negative public impact where money flows and legislative outcomes can be traced using live government data.”
APIs used: Congress.gov, Senate.gov, FEC (including Schedule B disbursements), FDIC, FRED, World Bank, Senate Lobbying (LDA)
Two case studies — one Republican (banking deregulation → bank failures) and one Democrat (pharmaceutical pricing → U.S. vs international drug costs) — following the complete pipeline: PAC money in → committee vote → law signed → measurable public cost.
Best-Case Positive Impact — One From Each Party
Prompt: “Investigate and find two examples of best case scenarios one for each party that shows when someone did something good or fought back.”
APIs used: Congress.gov, Senate.gov, FEC, Senate Lobbying (LDA), USAspending
Two case studies — one Republican (Chuck Grassley and criminal justice reform) and one Democrat (Tammy Baldwin and veterans’ healthcare) — where senators went against institutional pressure to pass legislation with measurable positive outcomes.
Presidential Economic Scorecard — Clinton Through Trump II
Prompt: “Compare the economic performance of every president going back to Clinton.”
APIs used: FRED (GDP, unemployment, jobs, CPI, Fed rate, S&P 500, deficit/GDP, debt), Treasury Fiscal Data, Federal Register, Congress.gov
A comprehensive side-by-side comparison using identical metrics at inauguration month for each president. Includes what each inherited, Congressional control, major external shocks (9/11, Great Recession, COVID-19), and key legislation.
How to Fix the Deficit — Democratic Plan vs. Republican Plan
Prompt: “Build the best plan for each party to reduce the deficit with explanations, caveats, and comparisons.”
APIs used: Treasury Fiscal Data, FRED, USAspending, World Bank, Congress.gov, BLS
Uses live fiscal data to present where the $38.76 trillion debt stands, then constructs the strongest possible plans — each graded on fiscal realism, political feasibility, and structural impact. Includes five uncomfortable truths neither party will say.